After another mass shooting, the media must keep focus on gun reform

Sign up for The Media Today, CJR’s daily newsletter.

On Saturday, there was yet another tragedy in America. A gunman opened fire on state troopers as they attempted to stop his vehicle near Midland, in the Permian Basin of West Texas. A high-speed chase ensued along 15 miles of highway linking Midland and Odessa; it lasted nearly two hours, during which time the shooter killed seven people, including a 15-year-old, and wounded others, including a 17-month-old child. As usual, reporters flocked to the scene. “We’re left where we always are after these conversations,” Garrett Haake told Chuck Todd on Meet the Press, “wondering what, if anything, will come from this, other than further discussion.”

The shooting attracted widespread coverage, including on the Sunday shows. Numerous outlets noted the massacre, less than a month ago, in El Paso, where a gunman targeting the Hispanic community murdered 22 people at a Walmart. They also mentioned a sharp irony: on Sunday, the day after the latest shooting, Texas enacted new laws loosening restrictions on gun possession, including in places of worship, schools, and apartment blocks. Democratic candidates for president centered gun laws during their campaign stops, leading to more press mentions. Nonetheless, the story competed for limited public attention over the long holiday weekend—most notably with Hurricane Dorian, the historically powerful Atlantic storm system that already wreaked havoc in the Bahamas and soon may hammer the East Coast of the US. A boat fire that killed at least 15 people in California also demanded our attention and empathy.

ICYMI: Why the press struggles to cover the war in Yemen

The shooting coverage we have seen has had a repetitive quality. After the El Paso massacre and another shooting, hours later, in Dayton, Ohio, Margaret Sullivan, of The Washington Post, wrote that when tragedy strikes, “we reflexively spring into action. We describe the horror of what happened, we profile the shooter, we tell about the victims’ lives, we get reaction from public officials.” Unsurprisingly, coverage of the West Texas shooting bore all these hallmarks; judging by this morning’s homepages, we’re now at the “profile the shooter” stage, which is always fraught for the press given the risk that our coverage could inspire copycats. If past form is any guide, the cycle is likely nearing its end.

In the same column, Sullivan assessed how the media might break this cycle. Going forward, she argued, we should call more clearly for politicians to take action on guns—doing so would end the numbing repetitiveness of our coverage, if not the tragedies themselves. Reporters and columnists could, between them, suggest possible solutions, demand specific plans from lawmakers, and ask our leaders what they’re doing to fix the problem for as long as it takes for them to fix it. Ultimately, Sullivan argued, such a pivot demands that we take sides, even if that remains an uncomfortable impulse for many old-school journalists. “Just as there was in the 1950s and 1960s while covering civil rights, or today in covering the climate crisis, there actually is a right or wrong side on the matter of controlling rampant gun violence,” she wrote.

Briefly, it looked like the El Paso and Dayton shootings might serve as an on-ramp for such an approach: their shocking proximity and (in the case of the El Paso massacre) racist motivation held public and media attention, and thus increased the pressure on politicians to do something. In the days following the shootings, Trump suggested he would push for more stringent background checks. Politico said this could constitute a “Nixon-to-China moment” for the president on guns, given the louder-than-usual outcry, Trump’s huge popularity among his base, and the financial and administrative mess engulfing the NRA; according to The Atlantic’s Elaina Plott, Ivanka Trump tried to entice her optics-obsessed father to pass a meaningful gun law by dangling the potential for a media-friendly signing ceremony in the Rose Garden. But that momentum petered out as media focus became diluted. By the middle of August—just weeks after the El Paso and Dayton shootings—Trump reassured Wayne LaPierre, chief executive of the NRA, that background checks were off the table. (No amount of mess, it seems, can weaken its influence.)

On August 6, three days after the El Paso and Dayton shootings, Politico’s Playbook team warned that the recent mass killings “could be all but forgotten as a political issue by the time Congress comes back in September.” With lawmakers set to return next week, we face an even more distressing possibility: another tragedy did happen, but looks unlikely to meaningfully move the needle in Washington. On Sunday, Trump referred to a package of gun-control measures the White House plans to push, but lawmakers remain divided on the substance of those measures. So far, the package’s headline seems to be a pledge to expedite the death penalty for mass murderers, rather than improved background checks.

It’s easy to say gun laws demand more sustained coverage; so do lots of urgent matters, and the news cycle is crammed right now. But the slew of needless deaths in recent weeks reminds us that if any issue merits continued media pressure, this one is surely near the top of the list. Pressure, of course, doesn’t mean our recalcitrant politicians will do something. But relieving the pressure pretty much guarantees they won’t.

Below, more on the West Texas shooting:

• The show must go on: KOSA-TV, a CNN affiliate in Odessa, was forced to evacuate its studio on Saturday due to the shooting’s proximity. Anchors left the set but kept their microphones on so they could continue to report off camera.
• No notoriety: At a news conference, Michael Gerke, Odessa’s police chief, declined to name the suspected gunman; “I’m not going to give him any notoriety for what he did,” Gerke said. The purposeful omission mirrored a growing trend among media outlets and officials. In March, Jacinda Ardern, the prime minister of New Zealand, refused to name the shooter who killed 51 Muslim worshippers in that country; in June, the police chief in Virginia Beach named a mass shooter there once and then said he would not repeat it.
• Misinformation: Doctored screenshots listing false information about the West Texas gunman circulated on social media in the aftermath of the shooting: far-right accounts, for instance, spread the claim that he was Jewish and a Democrat. The Daily Dot has more.

Other notable stories:

• Hurricane Dorian is battering the Bahamas, killing at least five people and causing massive destruction. Marcus Moore, one of the few reporters on the ground, called into ABC News from Marsh Harbour in the Abaco Islands. “This is a catastrophe like nothing I have seen before,” he said. “The building where we rode out the storm really is the only one in the immediate area that is still standing.” Dorian’s path is still uncertain, but large swathes of America’s East Coast are on high alert: currently, it’s expected to move “dangerously close” to Florida tonight, then continue toward Georgia and South Carolina tomorrow. The National Hurricane Center is providing updates.
• Trump canceled a trip to Poland to monitor Dorian, but spent swathes of the long weekend playing golf and attacking the press: he assailed the Post, for a story about “Trump’s lost summer,” and ABC’s Jonathan Karl, who pointed out that Trump misstated Dorian’s possible trajectory as including Alabama. The president also tweeted that “our primary opponent is the Fake News Media”; as CNN’s Brian Stelter noted, that foreshadowed “a key line from his re-election playbook.” Axios reports that allegations of bias by social media companies will also form a “core part” of Trump’s 2020 strategy.
• Yesterday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo lifted off for a visit to Brussels without any reporters on board, drawing a rebuke from a group representing State Department correspondents, CNN’s Oliver Darcy reports. Morgan Ortagus, a spokesperson for the department, said Pompeo’s plane was too small to accommodate the press corps; reporters were given “the offer to fly commercially,” she said, but “chose not to do so.”
• Thursday will mark one year since the publication, in the Times, of that op-ed by an anonymous senior administration official claiming to be part of an internal “Resistance” to Trump. We still don’t know who wrote it. “The fact that Anonymous remains anonymous seems like more than just a loose end,” the Post’s Paul Farhi notes. “In an age of oversharing and TMI, it is tantamount to a small miracle of restraint and discretion.”
• On Saturday, The Vindicator, a 150-year-old local newspaper serving Youngstown, Ohio, published its final edition. Shortly before its closure, the Tribune Chronicle, in nearby Warren, acquired The Vindicator’s name, subscriber list, and website; on Sunday, it published its first Mahoning County edition under The Vindicator’s masthead. But, as Nieman Lab’s Joshua Benton wrote recently, “it’s a brand surviving, not a newspaper.”
• GateHouse will pay out up to $425,000 to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by newspaper carriers at the Patriot Ledger, a GateHouse paper in Quincy, Massachusetts; the carriers claimed bosses misclassified them as contractors when they should have been treated as employees. ICYMI, I looked at the contractor-employee dispute around carriers, and the dangers they face in their work, for CJR’s Winter 2018 print issue.
• Britain is barreling toward elections: yesterday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed that he will seek a vote should rebel lawmakers succeed in blocking the possibility of Britain leaving the EU without an exit deal. As things stand, Brexit will happen, deal or no deal, on October 31; should it be postponed, an election would likely be held October 14. Amid all the chaos, some journalists seemed more interested yesterday by Johnson’s new dog. I assessed the latest round of Brexit coverage in Friday’s newsletter.
• CJR’s Zainab Sultan charts the world media’s treatment of the “forgotten war” in Yemen. “Coverage of the conflict, which has raged for five years and has precipitated one of the worst humanitarian crises in recent history, has been sporadic and simplistic,” Sultan writes. “It is, admittedly, a complex story—one that requires a nuanced understanding of the cultures and the political currents of a whole region.”
• And yesterday marked five years since ISIS militants in Syria murdered the journalist Steven Sotloff. Writing for CJR earlier this year, Joel Simon, executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, called on the US government to try the men who killed Sotloff and James Foley, a fellow journalist who was murdered shortly before Sotloff.

ICYMI: Malaysian sex-tape scandal poses a challenge for Muslim reporters

Has America ever needed a media defender more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.

Jon Allsop is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Review of Books, The New Yorker, and The Atlantic, among other outlets. He writes CJR’s newsletter The Media Today. Find him on Twitter @Jon_Allsop.