Sign up for The Media Today, CJRâs daily newsletter.
This article was also published by Guardian US.
And then there were 12. Yesterday, Cory Booker, the US senator from New Jersey, became the latest contender to drop out of the Democratic presidential primary. The field is still very big, but it has narrowed in one meaningful sense: it was once historically diverse, but with Booker out, just three candidates of color remain, only one of whom, the former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, is Black. Booker blamed the distraction of jury duty in President Trumpâs impending Senate impeachment trial for his exit, as well as his winnowing finances, exacerbated by his failure to qualify for recent Democratic debates, including tonightâs. It will take place in Iowa, which is 91-percent white. Every single candidate on stage will be white, too.
As is ritual in campaign coverage, after Booker dropped out, reporters and pundits chewed over the reasons for his failureâamong them, media obsessions with the campaign horse race (Booker never really cut through in the polls), and with shiny new objects (Exhibit A: Pete Buttigieg). âI think a big part of Bookerâs problem, why he never had âa moment,â was that heâd had so many moments before,â Olivia Nuzzi, Washington correspondent at New York magazine, wrote on Twitter. âHeâd been on magazine covers and the subject of glowing profiles since the mid-2000s. The political media was overly familiar with Booker and voters werenât familiar enough.â Amid all the postmortems, we saw paeans to Bookerâs personal decency and to his love-centered campaign rhetoric. On MSNBC, Booker emphasized that tone in a valedictory interview with one of his media admirers (and his old friend from Stanford), Rachel Maddow. âUniting Americans to a larger purpose,â he said, is his âprayerâ for the Democratic Party. (Elsewhere on TV, Bookerâs exit got buried under Elizabeth Warrenâs allegation that Bernie Sanders told her, in 2018, that a woman canât win in 2020âa claim Sanders strongly denies. For all their avowed disapproval of division, political pundits often find fighting more interesting than peace and love.)
ICYMI:Â The sentinel of the liberal media
Yesterdayâs Booker coverage also re-upped conversations about the structure of the Democratic primary, and its effect on voters and candidates of color. In recent weeks, Booker complained repeatedly that their perspectives have been excluded by the partyâs current debate-qualification rules, which prioritize polling and fundraising. Yesterday, pundits reiterated that critique, and there was renewed discussion, too, of Iowaâs place at the top of the primary calendar, which earns the state disproportionate attention every four years. âThe whiteness of [the] donor class and early states really matters,â Astead W. Herndon, a politics reporter for the New York Times, tweeted. âTheir vision of electability impacts viability.â
These might look like conversations for the Democratic Party, but theyâre important for the media, too. We could do much more to mitigate the distorting effects of imperfect democratic structures, and yet, too often, we reinforce and amplify them. Our preoccupation with âelectabilityâ is one such distortion. The concept is a hydra of conventional wisdom and internalized biases, and its predictive value is flimsy. (See: Trump, Donald.) And yet so many of our discussions about politics rest on it. If youâve listened to campaign reporters this cycle, youâll have heard ample evidenceâalbeit anecdotal, for the most partâthat many Democratic electors intend to vote not for their favored candidate, but for the one they think stands the best chance of beating Trump.
The press is integral in molding such judgments. And yet, as Sawyer Hackett, a staffer on JuliĂĄn Castroâs shuttered presidential campaign, told the Washington Postâs David Weigel last week, voters of color are underweighted in its calculus. âI have to believe that if newsrooms were more diverse we wouldnât be stuck with this narrative thatâs made voters think theyâre choosing between their minds and hearts,â Hackett said.
Itâs not the news mediaâs job to advocate for given candidatesâbut it is our job to challenge assumptions that unfairly benefit some at the expense of others. (Errin Haines, national writer on race and ethnicity at the Associated Press, put it best in a recent piece for Nieman Lab: âElection coverage is about choicesâof who gets seen and heard in our democracy.â) Similarly, itâs not the mediaâs job to change the primary calendarâbut it is our job to ensure that issues pertaining to race, and its intersection with every other issue of substance, continue to shape the conversation, regardless of the demographics of the state that gets to vote first.
As the Times acknowledged back in September, as media focus started to turn in earnest toward Iowa (five months before any actual voting), the stateâs caucuses âdisenfranchise huge blocs of voters,â and yet, âto a greater degree than in recent campaigns, this unrepresentative and idiosyncratic state is proving that it is the only electoral battleground that matters for Democrats.â We should be counterbalancing that logic, not eagerly indulging it. And yet, as in so many cycles past, the Iowa feeding frenzy is kicking in again, to the exclusion of other issues, and voices, that matter.
Despite its homogenous candidate line-up, tonightâs debate is an opportunity to be more inclusive. Its moderators will bear a greater responsibility than usual to channel the perspectives and concerns of communities that donât look like most of Iowaâand not just in a one-off question halfway through the running order. Given all the noise around Sanders and Warrenâs crumbling non-aggression pact, the temptation to center conflict, instead, will doubtless be strong.
Below, more on 2020:
- The race beat: For CJRâs recent print issue on disinformation, Haines explored how disinformation campaigns are seeking to suppress the Black vote. Haines also wrote for our Fall 2018 print issue, on race and journalism, about her life on the race beat. If you missed it at the time, you can find all our content from that issue here.
- Speaking of Sanders: The editorial board of the Times is bringing readers (and viewers) inside its 2020 presidential endorsement decision. (Its verdict is expected January 19.) Yesterday, it published the first of its in-depth candidate interviews, with Sanders, Tom Steyer, and Booker, since he dropped out. Sanders told Charlie Warzel, a tech columnist for the Times, that he doesnât have any apps on his phone. (Questions remain as to his plan for big tech.)
- Is it happening again?: The Russian military has been busy hacking Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company at the heart of unevidenced GOP corruption claims against Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Nicole Perlroth and Matthew Rosenberg write for the Times that while the hack remains murky, its scale and timing âsuggest that the Russians could be searching for potentially embarrassing material on the Bidensâ ahead of the election.
- FECless: Dave Levinthal, of the Center for Public Integrity, reports that Trump has so far declined to fill three vacant slots on the Federal Election Commission, rendering the regulator inquorate in an election year. Senate Republicans want Trump to take action, but as things stand, Levinthal writes, 2020 âwill simply be staged without the FEC playing any meaningful law enforcement role.â (You can guess who stands to benefit.)
- The debate: The debate tonight will kick off at 9pm EST on CNN. Drake University in Des Moines will host, with Wolf Blitzer and Abby Phillip, of CNN, and Brianne Pfannenstiel, the top politics reporter at the Des Moines Register, moderating. (The Times has a useful profile of Pfannenstiel.)
Other notable stories:
- The Postâs Philip Rucker, John Hudson, Shane Harris, and Josh Dawsey trace Trumpâs claim, first made on Fox News on Friday, that Qassem Suleimani, Iranâs top general, was plotting to attack four US embassies when the president ordered that he be killed. âBased on what is known so far,â the Post reports, the claim âwas at best an unfounded theory and at worst a falsehoodââdeepening the administrationâs âcredibility crisis.â
- In November, Alden Global Capital, the private-equity firm notorious for cost-slashing at its media properties, became Tribune Publishingâs biggest shareholder. Yesterday, Tribune said it would offer buyouts to staffers who have eight or more years of experience. Tim Knight, its president and CEO, cited âindustry-wide revenue challenges.â Peter Nickeas, a Chicago Tribune reporter, told CNN that the news is âdisheartening.â
- Abby Huntsman is quitting The View. She plans to join the campaign of her father, Jon Huntsman, Jr., a Republican who is running to reclaim his old job as governor of Utah. (Jon Huntsmanâs brother Paul Huntsman owns the Salt Lake Tribune, which he recently steered into nonprofit status. As a result, the paper can no longer make endorsements.) Per CNN, Abby Huntsman had also complained of a toxic environment at The View.
- Natalie Edwards, an official with the Treasury Departmentâs Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, pleaded guilty to leaking financial reports to BuzzFeed, including information concerning Paul Manafort, Trumpâs jailed former campaign chair; his associate Rick Gates; and the Russian embassy. Politicoâs Erin Durkin has more.
- Yesterday, Major League Baseball hammered the Houston Astros, imposing major penalties related to a cheating scandal. Among other measures, MLB banned Brandon Taubman, the Astrosâ former assistant general manager, until the end of 2020 for screaming at female reporters in praise of a player accused of domestic violence.
- For The Nation, Tony Wood explores the journalistic output of the Colombian writer Gabriel GarcĂa MĂĄrquez. Throughout his career, fiction and reportage were âconstantly interwoven,â Wood writes. âOral traditions, legends, and popular memories and the evidence of his eyes and ears work[ed] to nourish and creatively enrich each other.â
- In Slovakia, a trial tied to the murders of JĂĄn Kuciak, an investigative journalist, and Martina KuĆĄnĂrovĂĄ, his fiancĂ©e, opened yesterday. One of the four suspected killers pleaded guilty to murder; MariĂĄn KoÄner, the oligarch charged with masterminding the killing, did not. (Last year, I looked at the ramifications of the case in an article for CJR.)
- In Britain, declassified documents revealed that the government made secret payments to Reuters during the Cold War. The moneyâwhich was earmarked by a propaganda agency within Britainâs foreign ministry, then funneled through the BBCâwas intended to expand Reutersâs coverage of the Middle East and Latin America. The BBC has more.
- And for WBURâs Only A Game, Martin Kessler spoke with Anthony Federico, a web editor at ESPN who was fired after his headline about basketball star Jeremy Lin went viral due to its racist connotations. Federico is now a priest. Per Kessler, he âbelieves his experience facing social media outrage and death threats will shape his work.â
ICYMI:Â Words you may not have known were named after people
Jon Allsop is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Review of Books, The New Yorker, and The Atlantic, among other outlets. He writes CJRâs newsletter The Media Today. Find him on Twitter @Jon_Allsop.