Sign up for The Media Today, CJRâs daily newsletter.
Domestic and sexual violence are notoriously challenging for journalists, especially for sports writers. Those challenges were on full display earlier this month in a Boston Globe story about New England Sports Network television analyst and former Boston Red Sox player Steve Lyons, who was arrested on charges including domestic battery and intimidation of witnesses (all since dismissed) as a result of a January incident at his California home.
The lede of Nick Cafardoâs initial story in the Globe describes the charge as something Lyons had been âdealing with.â Sports Illustratedâs Khadrice Rollins echoed that language, writing, “Boston Red Sox analyst Steve Lyons has been missing NESN broadcasts recently to deal with a domestic battery charge in California.â
As Baseball Prospectus writer Meg Rowley said on Twitter about the language used by SI: You ââdealâ with flat tires, snow storms, [and] leaky roofs,â and, in this case, âirritatingly passive descriptions of alleged abusers.â This wording makes the case sound like an inconvenience for Lyons, something he had to wait out and get over with so he could return to Boston.
TRENDING:Â âI havenât thought about the impact of the photo. I know that itâs everywhereâ
The story seemed to excuse someone charged in an incident that resulted in injuries to his girlfriendâs face, according to a police report acquired by the Globe. According to the Globeâs follow-up reporting, police lost photos they had taken at the scene to show injuries to Lyonsâs girlfriend, photos a defense attorney claimed showed no noticeable injuries. The girlfriend told police Lyons did not strike her. A judge opted to dismiss the charges.
Journalists at the Globe did not respond to multiple requests via email to discuss its story, and when I called, I was told the editor who worked on the piece was out of the office and not available for comment before my deadline.
This is an industry-wide issue that goes beyond sports media. In a particularly egregious example, after MLB player Jose Reyes was suspended last season under the leagueâs domestic violence policy for allegedly grabbing his wife by the throat and slamming her into a sliding glass door, a USA Today story by Bob Nightengale refashioned Reyes as the victim, noting, âThe man forfeited his dignity. He will forfeit about $7 million. He even lost his job,â and adding it was âto [Reyesâs] creditâ that he was participating with the MLB investigation.
Just last week, ESPN ran a headline about NFL player Ezekiel Elliottâs suspension for domestic violence that read, âCowboysâ Ezekiel Elliott suspended six games for conduct.â
Fixed it for you, ESPN. pic.twitter.com/aF1aRBSBOm
— Eric Phillips (@EricFPhillips) August 11, 2017
Sports writers have come a long way in how they write about allegations of domestic or sexual violence against players. (Mostly) gone are the days of including quotes from teammates and coaches about what a “great guy” the alleged abuser is, or soundbites about how âeveryone makes mistakes,â completely ignoring that domestic violence is generally part of a broader pattern of behavior. In fact, by the time the police or public become aware of the abuse, itâs usually been going on for quite a long time.
The growing number of women covering sports has helped. As Hall of Fame baseball writer Claire Smith said when I interviewed her for Vogue earlier this summer, âIf athletes or coaches want to say those things [about players accused of violence being âgood guysâ who make mistakes] . . . weâre allowed to call them on the way they say them.â
Balanced reporting doesnât mean assuming the alleged perpetratorâs guilt, but it does mean challenging flawed assumptions and empty quotes from defense attorneys. It means pushing back against pervasive cultural beliefs that put the onus for abuse on the victims and always give the benefit of the doubt to people accused of perpetrating violence.
There is more we can learn from the Globe story: Another major mistake is that the piece quotes Lyonsâs lawyer, Richard A. Hutton, apparently without contacting the alleged victim or her attorney (or mentioning whether such an interview was attempted). In the Globe piece, Hutton is quoted as saying that Lyonsâs girlfriend, âtold authorities within 36 hours of the incident that he had never struck her or touched her in an offensive way.â The piece ends with Hutton saying, âSteve and [his girlfriend] have been together since the incident.â There is no counterpoint from an opposing counsel or court-appointed advocate.
This kind of reporting is not âneutral.â It treats the defense attorneyâs words as facts, when itâs the defense attorneyâs job to discredit the victim. Also, it uses the police report as the victimâs âside,â but attempts to discredit the report with statements from Lyonsâs attorney. Was no one working on the case in the prosecutorâs office contacted to speak on behalf of the alleged victim? The story also gives the defense attorney the last word. Do you see the problem here? Lyons has an advocate speaking on his behalf in the story, but his girlfriend does not. The story is reported from the perpetratorâs standpoint, and the victim gets no perspective. By failing to provide adequate context for the victimâs point of view, the Globeâs story fails as a piece of journalism.
Not only is it basic journalism to contact counsel for both sides in a criminal case (and mention that it was attempted, or clarify why it didnât happen), part of our job as journalists is to make sure weâre providing the appropriate context and explanations of the topics we cover. Yahoo Sports managed to do this, citing Cafardoâs reporting and adding this commentary:
âWe should emphasize that most of this information comes directly from Lyonsâ attorney, so itâs going to be heavily slanted in his favor. We have not heard from the other side yet, and may not, considering Lyonsâ girlfriend is not a public figure. What Hutton says paints Lyons as innocent, but thatâs also his job.â
But all of this coverage fails by not including context on domestic violence incidents or helping readers better understand the dynamics at play in these situations.
Providing this context means that, after quoting Lyonsâs attorney, the writer should offer a quote from a domestic violence advocate to explain that itâs common for victims to drop charges or rescind allegations. The reasons for this include fear, threats, or promises from the abuser to change and make it up to themâââpromises victims believe because they want so desperately for them to be true, because the person who hurts them is also the person they love.
Balanced reporting would also mean providing statistics or an expert quote about how common it is for victims to stay with their abusers, about how a victim will leave a relationship an average of seven times before she departs for good, how the reasons for staying are complicated and nuanced and valid.
Balanced reporting doesnât mean assuming the alleged perpetratorâs guilt, but it does mean challenging flawed assumptions and empty quotes from defense attorneys. It means pushing back against pervasive cultural beliefs that put the onus for abuse on the victims and always give the benefit of the doubt to people accused of perpetrating violence.
Lyonsâs girlfriend deserves the benefit of the doubt from journalists, who should seek out experts who can speak to her side of the issue, instead of ensuring the voice that already holds all the power keeps it. The scales are already tipped far in Lyonsâs favor as a man and a public figure.
Iâm asking every one of us to do better when we cover these kinds of stories. Peopleâs lives literally depend on it.
ICYMI:Â 7 quick tips for conducting tough interviews
Has America ever needed a media defender more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.