Sign up for The Media Today, CJRâs daily newsletter.
February was when I had the first inkling that something unsettling was happening. In early March, it was clear there was a major problem. And by late March, there was no question that a large segment of the population was enduring an epidemic of misinformation.
As the nation girded to face its biggest challenge since World War II, much of the coronavirus coverage from right-wing websitesâwebsites that you may never have heard of, but which are read by millions every dayâwas characterized by faulty projections, inflammatory anti-Chinese rhetoric, and over-the-top praise for President Trump.
Because I read up to thirty conservative news websites every morning for my website TheRighting, Iâve followed these stories. And I have found they fall into seven basic categories.
Denial
The denialists began in late February, led by conservative radio personality Rush Limbaugh, who also posts full transcripts of his show on his websiteâa key fact in the spread of his ideas. In his February 24 commentary, Limbaugh called coronavirus âthe common cold.â Limbaugh correctly said that the survival rate was 98 percent, but he omitted predictions that a third of the country could become infected. At this point, there werenât many conservative stories denying the severity of the coronavirus pandemic. The influential Limbaugh set the tone.
Itâs getting better all the time
Once there was no denying that the pandemic was in and around us, the coverage shifted to âitâs not so bad and it wonât last too long.â American Thinkerâs March 9 story âCoronavirus Codswallopâ stated that the statistics about the pandemic âshould be taken with a grain of salt.â A day earlier, the New York Post told its readers that âthe spread of the virus continues to slow.â Dr. William Hazeltine, writing for FoxNews.com on March 21, predicted that the pandemic may end sooner than we expect.
Trump praise
Stories from right-wing websites praising Trumpâs handling of the crisis then came to dominate the coverage. The Daily Caller labeled Trumpâs much-criticized February 27 press conference, in which he presented the overall risk of the coronavirus to Americans as very low, a âmaster class in crisis management.â A few days later an opinion article on the same site stated that Trump âhas got the coronavirus situation completely under control.â Trumpâs March 11 Oval Office address drew plaudits from the New York Post (âTrump Passes Coronavirus Test with Flying Colorsâ) and FoxNews.com (âTrump Coronavirus Response Will Protect Americaâs Economy, Workers and Businessesâ). Writing in CNS News on March 20, Christian leader Franklin Graham gushed, âThank God we have a president who knows how to take charge.â Not to be outdone, in late March, Lara Trump penned an op-ed for FoxNews.com that read more like advertising copy: âMy father-in-law, President Trump, is showing what leadership looks like in a time of crisis.â
China scorn
At least half of conservative coverage centered on the name of the virus, with right-wing journalists enthusiastically labeling it âChina coronavirusâ or âWuhan virus.â Limbaugh and the American Thinker put forth the theories that somehow the virus had escaped or was deliberately released from a lab in China, and that the country was buying up stocks in the slumping market. (The headline was âDid China panic the world and steal our wealth with a common cold?â) American Greatness called the virus a way for China to destroy the United States.
The cure is worse than the disease
The first stories suggesting that the remedies to battle covid-19 were worse than the actual disease began showing up in mid-March. A number of media outlets voiced this perspective, including the Washington Times, The Federalist, and BernardGoldberg.com. The Epoch Times expressed a similar concern and added, âFor a disease that so far has extracted a relatively small death toll and from which a quarter of those infected have already recovered, why are we reacting as if Covid-19 is the second coming of the Black Death?â
Bashing the rest of the media
Conservative media became increasingly critical of major mainstream media outlets and their reporters throughout the coverage of the crisis. Conservative commentator Todd Starnes wrote that NBCâs Peter Alexander, whom he described as a propagandist, âgot what was coming to himâ after President Trump rebuked him for asking if he was giving Americans false hope. The Power Line blog claimed on March 24 that MSNBC and CNN have reduced covering the administrationâs press conferences because they were showing the administration in a positive light. Predictably, both The Federalist and American Greatness accused the mainstream media of stoking public hysteria, which correctly characterized some of the reporting without acknowledging the widespread under-reaction from the right.
Bashing Democrats
Thereâs nothing new about conservative media disparaging Democrats. But the criticism intensified as the crisis grew. A RedState article accused Joe Biden of plagiarizing Trumpâs plan to combat the âWuhanâ virus. March 13 articles on Breitbart and American Greatness stated that the coronavirus spread because the Democrats diverted the attention of the country with the impeachment effort. Community Digital News ran an inflammatory headline calling House Speaker Nancy Pelosi âthe ring leader of Demsâ covid-19 relief thievery.â The body of the story called her a âbitchâ who âpisses on Americanâs [sic] collective leg.â
Of course, there were dozens of other coronavirus-related stories published in right-wing media that couldnât be neatly categorized. And a handful were even critical of the administrationâs efforts.
But probably the most important and influential story coming from the right during the pandemic was Tucker Carlsonâs commentary published March 10 on FoxNews.com (and delivered by Carlson on the network the night before). He was virtually alone among conservative commentators in stating unequivocally that the virus will get worse, and he called upon the countryâs leaders to stop lying about it. (Itâs worth noting that he had visited the president days before to deliver the message in person.) By March 13, President Trump had changed his tune and acknowledged the challenge facing the world. It was a watershed moment in the administrationâs approach to the coronavirus.
Carlsonâs call to action was something of a miracle. Here was a controversial conservative journalist putting forth an opinion about a divisive issue that both Democrats and Republicans would soon embrace. How often does that occur? We must hope that it was not too little, too late.
Has America ever needed a media defender more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.