The New York Times deemed newsy enough to merit lead story placement its piece, based on “more than four dozen interviews,” about Al Qaeda “rebuilding” and now “thriv[ing] in tribal lands” in Pakistan while in Washington a “secret” Bush administration “plan” to “make it easier for the Pentagon’s Special Operations forces to launch missions” into those areas “has been held up…by the very disagreements it was meant to eliminate” — namely, “turf battles” and “policy disputes” among those in Washington and Islamabad tasked with fighting terrorism.
White House spokesperson Dana Perino, per Politico, deemed the piece “nothing new” (in contrast to a more heated White House reaction to the story apparently teased by Drudge last night).


Recent Comments
-
Hayyim smith on
Park Slope Pundits Get the Story Wrong
(7)
-
padikiller on
What Drives Public Opinion About Climate Change?
(13)
-
Peteykins on
Harlan Ellison says: 'Pay the damn writer!'
(1)
-
Harris Meyer on
Some Mistakes at MoneyWatch
(2)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Audit Notes: Payment Protection, Greek Austerity, Inflation Bugaboo
(4)
-
dwl on
Stories I'd Like to See
(1)
-
Mark Richard on
Bad Math From the WSJ Opinion Pages
(10)
-
Dan A. on
Nevada GOP Shows How Not to Conduct a Caucus
(2)
More