Kevin Drum muses on what might have been had the media not “ignored” the candidates’ cap-and-trade plans (which reporters ignored, Drum guesses, because the candidates “weren’t attacking each other” on this issue). Per Drum:
Which is kinda too bad because it had all the elements of an epic battle. It really is true that Obama’s version of cap-and-trade amounts to a tax increase, and that would have been an issue right in McCain’s share-the-wealth-tax-raising-socialist wheelhouse. Conversely, McCain’s version of cap-and-trade really would have provided enormous windfall profits to coal plants and other carbon emitters (explanation here), and that would been right in Obama’s fat-cat-more-of-the-same wheelhouse. It could have been a great fight.Instead we got Joe the Plumber and Obama the terrorist lover. Oh well. We’ll do better next time, right?


Recent Comments
-
padikiller on
What Drives Public Opinion About Climate Change?
(13)
-
Jackie Najalack on
Park Slope Pundits Get the Story Wrong
(6)
-
Peteykins on
Harlan Ellison says: 'Pay the damn writer!'
(1)
-
Harris Meyer on
Some Mistakes at MoneyWatch
(2)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Audit Notes: Payment Protection, Greek Austerity, Inflation Bugaboo
(4)
-
dwl on
Stories I'd Like to See
(1)
-
Mark Richard on
Bad Math From the WSJ Opinion Pages
(10)
-
Dan A. on
Nevada GOP Shows How Not to Conduct a Caucus
(2)
More