Howard Kurtz today takes a macrocosmic—literally, macrocosmic—view of the media’s post-Tuesday treatment of the Democrats’ Epic Battle for Cosmic Domina—er, Nomination:
For the moment, there seem to be two separate media universes out there.
In the mainstream print galaxy, Hillary’s “options” are “dwindling,” her “path” to the nomination is “narrowing,” the “math” is “challenging,” Obama is drawing “closer” to the prize.
On MSNBC, the morning shows and the blogosphere, it’s game, set, match. The race is finis, the last rites are being administered, and the debate is about Obama’s chances against McCain.
It’s a fascinating case study: Do the remnants of the MSM that are still treating this as a semi-competitive race believe that Clinton has a serious shot at the nomination, but feel bound by the rule of objectivity not to say so?
Or are the pundits going out on a limb, prematurely writing off Clinton as they have done several times before?
I’d say it’s both. Talk about worlds colliding.


Recent Comments
-
Hayyim smith on
Park Slope Pundits Get the Story Wrong
(7)
-
padikiller on
What Drives Public Opinion About Climate Change?
(13)
-
Peteykins on
Harlan Ellison says: 'Pay the damn writer!'
(1)
-
Harris Meyer on
Some Mistakes at MoneyWatch
(2)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Audit Notes: Payment Protection, Greek Austerity, Inflation Bugaboo
(4)
-
dwl on
Stories I'd Like to See
(1)
-
Mark Richard on
Bad Math From the WSJ Opinion Pages
(10)
-
Dan A. on
Nevada GOP Shows How Not to Conduct a Caucus
(2)
More