Why does The Wall Street Journal put a fourth-day news story about a golfer’s minor car accident on page-two today?
That’s what it does with the Tiger Woods story, giving readers a run-of-the-mill news story with not much anyone interested hadn’t already read elsewhere. There’s no unique Journal take on this, and the business angle is relegated to a couple of paragraphs at the bottom. Suffice it to say it wouldn’t have got near the play in the pre-Murdoch paper.
Yes, yes, Rupert Murdoch wants a general-interest newspaper to compete head-on with The New York Times. Yes, its readers like golf. And yes, we’re coming off a holiday weekend with low staffing and low news flow.
This isn’t the biggest thing in the world, but it’s a glimpse at a misallocation of resources, as well as of emphasis. We are, after all, still in the midst of an economic and financial crisis.
The Times handled it correctly—relegating the story (a much better effort than the WSJ’s, by the way) to the sports section, where it belonged.



Recent Comments
-
Mark Richard on
What Drives Public Opinion About Climate Change?
(9)
-
Jackie Najalack on
Park Slope Pundits Get the Story Wrong
(6)
-
Peteykins on
Harlan Ellison says: 'Pay the damn writer!'
(1)
-
Harris Meyer on
Some Mistakes at MoneyWatch
(2)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Audit Notes: Payment Protection, Greek Austerity, Inflation Bugaboo
(4)
-
dwl on
Stories I'd Like to See
(1)
-
Mark Richard on
Bad Math From the WSJ Opinion Pages
(10)
-
Dan A. on
Nevada GOP Shows How Not to Conduct a Caucus
(2)
More