It’s, ahem, interesting to see Hero Harry Markopolos’s take on Murdoch as the Journal takeover was proceeding. This in an email to reporter John Wilke (warning: big PDF):
Murdoch would be poison for the paper. As far as editorial freedom, the WSJ’s editorials are so bad right now I actually think Murdoch could only improve them. It’s the WSJ’s unsurpassed content outside of those whack-job editorials that I worry about. WSJ reporters are the world’s best business reporters bar none. If the WSJ falls prey to Murdoch, that’ll leave only the FT and the Economist as world-class repositories for serious, insightful financial journalism. You guys really need to start slamming Murdoch on the front pages.
And as a reporter there at the time, I can tell you nine out of ten news staffers agreed with every word of that.



Recent Comments
-
Thimbles on
What Drives Public Opinion About Climate Change?
(10)
-
Jackie Najalack on
Park Slope Pundits Get the Story Wrong
(6)
-
Peteykins on
Harlan Ellison says: 'Pay the damn writer!'
(1)
-
Harris Meyer on
Some Mistakes at MoneyWatch
(2)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Audit Notes: Payment Protection, Greek Austerity, Inflation Bugaboo
(4)
-
dwl on
Stories I'd Like to See
(1)
-
Mark Richard on
Bad Math From the WSJ Opinion Pages
(10)
-
Dan A. on
Nevada GOP Shows How Not to Conduct a Caucus
(2)
More