It’s that time of year again for the newsweeklies: Christ-as-Cover-Boy time.
Jesus, of course, is as reliably evergreen a cover subject as they come — ever-mysterious, ever-controversial — and one that, naturally, pops up annually on newsstands around Easter and/or Christmas. With the appearance this week of two visually similar Jesus Cover Stories (Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report), we wondered: How has the Jesus Cover Story been packaged over the years? How has it changed (or not)?
Often, such covers involve a painting of a cherubic Jesus cradled in Mary’s arms accompanied by a question (some variation on Who Was He?) or a nod to some book or bit of research which shows How Jesus Isn’t Who You Thought He Was. Such is the case this week with Newsweek’s and U.S. News’ dueling Jesus covers — which, although they feature paintings from entirely different centuries, can be hard to differentiate for a newsstand browser with no art history training.
On U.S. News’ cover, reporter Jay Tolson is “In Search of the Real Jesus” — having apparently lost track of Him sometime after March of 2004 (when Tolson wrote a cover story titled, “The Real Jesus.”) While Time “Search[ed] for Jesus” on a December 1996 cover (and “Search[ed] for Mary” back in 1991), its cover has thus far been Jesus- (and Mary-) free this year (ditto the years 2000-2003). Not so Newsweek, with the current cover headline: “The World of the Nativity: How First-Century Jewish Family Values Shaped Christianity” (which reminded us a bit of Tolson’s above-referenced 2004 Jesus Cover Story for U.S. News, subtitled,-“How the Jewish reformer lost his Jewish identity.”)
Disappointingly, our study of the evolution of the Jesus Cover Story was hampered by poor technology: U.S. News’ online archive offers no cover images and only dates back to 2003 (when, on December 22, Jay Tolson co-authored a Jesus Cover Story called, “Jesus in America”). Newsweek’s online archive also lacks cover images (it appears there was a Jesus Cover on December 13, 2004 titled, “The Birth of Jesus.”) Time, however, has a complete cover archive on its Web site (searchable, with images) dating back to 1938, enabling us to really drill down into Time’s history of Jesus Covers. There have been 21. Here are two of our favorites — each a divine sort of mini-time capsule:
From the dawn of the dot-com days, the December 16, 1996 cover: “Jesus Online: How the Internet is shaping our views of faith and religion,” a story sprinkled with now-quaint references to the “World Wide Web,” online “bulletin boards” and “AltaVista,” a “powerful Internet search engine.” The reporter wrote, excitedly: “Look for Christ on the Web and you’ll find him — some 146,000 times.” (Compare that to the more than seven million hits you get when you Google Christ today).
From an era when many men looked like Jesus, the June 21, 1971 cover, featuring a psychedelic, lavender-faced cartoon Jesus and a report on “The Jesus Revolution” (“Jesus is alive and well and living in the radical spiritual fervor of a growing number of young Americans who have proclaimed an extraordinary religious revolution in his name….It is a startling development for a generation that has been constantly accused of tripping out or copping out with sex, drugs and violence…”)
In fact, we got a little carried away fiddling with Time’s cover archive and, although you can’t judge a magazine by its cover (can you?), we present to you some of the fruits of our fiddling: a sampling of people/topics (as categorized by Time) and how many times Time, according to its searchable archive, has featured them/it on the cover:
Darth Vader: 4
Dick Cheney: 3
Journalism: 40
Poverty: 14


This in-depth study of the images and characterizations of Jesus in the press is a truly interesting seasonal puff piece...
But, just for laughs, how about showing your readers those innocuous Mohammed cartoons that sent millions of Muslims into a tizzy and caused them to riot and murder all over the world?.. How about an analysis of images of Mohammed througout history?...
HUH?...
Do this and THEN you might be doing that journalism thing here.. Or something like it...
Let's see...
Puff piece or journalism?...
Puff piece or journalism?...
Hmmmm...
That's a REAL tough one!..
Wonder what CJR will do, huh folks?....
Posted by padikiller on Thu 14 Dec 2006 at 06:03 PM
Yes, CJR, I also find this article deficient for not including at least a sidebar about the Global Struggle. In the future, please remember to refract each and every subject through your handy Crusader's Lens, which I believe you'll find at the bottom of your Fruity Pebbles box.
Posted by jony d. on Fri 15 Dec 2006 at 02:18 AM
For the record, I'm not a Christian and as a matter of fact I find no reliable evidence to support the claim that Jesus ever existed.. I'm not making a religious point here...
So forget your misguided referense to a "global struggle" of the "crusaders" in the context of my argument...
I'm talking about the inability of "professional journalists" to present the NEWS...
How about showing the CJR readers the innocuous cartoon images of Mohammed that triggered world riots?... Why can't readers receive the information they need to understand the issues?...
HUH?...
CNN had no problem portraying a portrait of Jesus crafted from feces... But the network refused to air a SINGLE one of the Mohammed cartoons (giving different reasons in response to criticism)..
Where are CJR's ever vigilant "watchdogs" in the face of such jouralistic malpractice?
There's nothing inherently wrong with a puff-piece on the images of Jesus presented by the MSM...
But there IS something inherently wrong about censoring relevant news that some people may find "offensive"... Like the Mohammed cartoons, for example...
WHY is that CJR and most other MSM outlets chose to censor the news?.... Why is that CJR feels that it can publish a fluffy analysis of the evolution of the depiction of Jesus by the MSM, but that it can't deal with the MSM's inability ot provide depictions of Mohammed concerning a global story of worldwide violence and mayhem?...
What's more important?...
A seasonal puff piece?
Or honestly and fearlessly covering a global cartoon-inspired riot?...
Posted by padikiller on Fri 15 Dec 2006 at 10:08 AM